Subject:
|
Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 18 May 1999 22:04:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1241 times
|
| |
|
|
James Brown wrote:
> But you are not going anywhere. Therefore you are not fulfilling the purpose
> of walking.
But you are moving - the purpose of walking.
> People throughout the ages have been. Check your ancient history.
Precisely - why are people dredging out ancient history. Lets go back
to Roman times and get ourselves killed - back to the past!
> "it" gets into their head. Care to clarify that?
The intial thought of homosexuality - if no-one knew it existed no-one
would ever have those feelings in the first place - the power of the
mind.
> How is euthanasia even remotely relevant? Stick to the topic, please.
You said it was about having 2 consenting adults - this was a
counter-example.
> That is not sufficient grounds for your argument. Using the same premise,
> people who cook are ill, because they go against their natural diet.
There is no natural diet - only food which makes the person survive -
otherwise they will become ill.
> As I have mentioned before, provide some medical proof, please.
Why don't you prove it isn't?
> Who determines normal?
Who determines deviance?
> Well, unless you're playing devil's advocate, I think I've got a pretty good
> idea, and, to be honest, I don't see much point in continuing. You seem
> unwilling to shift your position, state it clearly, or defend it.
OK, I'll let you do a concluding statement then in response to this one
- make it quite short and we'll leave it at that - no-one is going to
win methinks.
The opinion I have expressed here states that:
Homosexuality is an illness or false illness created by the power of the
mind.
Simple sexual mechanics dictate that it is unnatural.
The point of a serious relationship is to eventually procreate (some
couples will decide not to but there is the potential)
It creates social problems that don't need to exist.
James reply:....
--
Carbon 60
ICQ # 5643170
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
| (...) You brought it up! (...) Uh...then where did it come from? (...) OK, instead of cooking, how about sewing? Is it natural to wear suits? (...) Because the burden of proof is on the person with the ridiculous beliefs. (...) Exactly his point. (...) (26 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
| (...) OK, I thought we'd hashed this out, but apparantly I underestimated your capacity for obstinence. Walking is moving. Your statement above is the logical equivalent of saying the purpose of carrot is vegtable. (...) Actually, until it started (...) (26 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
| (...) <snipped most of the back and forth about 'what is walking'> (...) But you are not going anywhere. Therefore you are not fulfilling the purpose of walking. (...) People throughout the ages have been. Check your ancient history. (...) "it" gets (...) (26 years ago, 17-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
150 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
