Subject:
|
Re: Evolution - Impossible!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Jan 2001 21:21:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1131 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:
> you can't).
> >
> > The article has evidence enough, shall I quote it? (rhetorical)
> > > I see no point in arguing about sections that we don't disagree on -
> > > identify what you agree with and what you don't and I can go from there.
>
> > I toyed with posting the article in it's entirety :-)
> > But I'll simply say this:
> > I'll be happy to defend anything in it.
> >
> > -Jon
>
> I gave you essentially two options and I'd respond to either: point out
> where any parts of the article were published in a reputable scientific
> journal and I'd respond to those, or tell me which parts of the article you
> agree with and what parts you disagree with and I'd respond. You've done
> neither.
>
> It seems most likely that you haven't done the one because no such article
> exists, and the second because you don't have the courage of your
> convictions, or possibly feel that if you disagree with anything it will
> give the other side ammo (winning is more important than what you suspect
> the truth to be). You want wiggle-room. Anyway, the conditions stand.
You're missing the point again. I started the thread - and I asked for
refutation - it is you who have provided none. Nor have you cited any published
articles which refute it. My condition stands.
You are the target of your own words. Somehow I doubt you'll recognize this
though.
-Jon
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Evolution - Impossible!
|
| (...) Here's what you said: How about another point of view? msnhomepages.talkcit...ssible.htm -Jon (I was being conservative with 10^50) Don't see any conditions, I don't see any call for refutation. Again, you have been challenged by several (...) (26 years ago, 24-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Evolution - Impossible!
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes: you can't). (...) I gave you essentially two options and I'd respond to either: point out where any parts of the article were published in a reputable scientific journal and I'd respond to those, or tell (...) (26 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
