 | | FA – Babies
|
| FA – Babies(?) I caught a 20 minute news item last night concerning a UK couple how have adopted twins from the US. They did this as: 1) There is over demand for babies in the UK – this means that prospective adoptive parents find it hard to get (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: FA – Babies
|
| Scott, thanks for pointing this story out. (...) Well, it's rude to back out of the deal I suppose, but at the same time, if you can get a little cash out of it and send the kid to a better family, then why not? (...) Why would a government stop (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: FA – Babies
|
| (...) But how did the mother know it was a "better family"? (...) Time will tell if everyone is a "winner". Even if they are - who is to say that the babies could not have gotten a better familiy if the system was better regulated? (...) Yes. (...) (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: FA – Babies
|
| (...) you (...) Well, I think it's better that it be up to the people involved, rather than some strange bystander (you), to determine what a "better" family is. Some people think that a religious family would be an important ingrediant in "good" or (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: FA – Babies
|
| (...) or you? (...) Me neither. Some religious values are *good* though. (...) Should one have the right to buy and sell humans - is that not akin to slavery? (...) If one does not want a baby, once born, why should they be able to choose where it (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
