To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8782
8781  |  8783
Subject: 
Re: FA – Babies
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 19:01:37 GMT
Viewed: 
113 times
  
Scott, thanks for pointing this story out.

However, there is much more to the story than that. It appears that the
babies they now have had already been placed with a family in the US, and
that the natural mother had tricked the US family into returning the babies
to her when the UK couple doubled her “expenses” (~$14000).

Well, it's rude to back out of the deal I suppose, but at the same time, if you
can get a little cash out of it and send the kid to a better family, then why
not?

All this leaves me feeling:
Disappointed that UK law could not stop this – we have a some sort of
agreement with the US which means that UK couple will only have to meet US
standards.
Disappointed that US law could not stop this.

Why would a government stop such a deal where everyone involved is a winner?

Disappointed regarding the apparent morals of the natural “mother”.

You disagree with the morality of her actions?

Disappointed regarding the apparent morals of the UK couple.

Gosh.

Pity for the US family involved (The Allens):

It is a shame when your past crimes haunt you.

“Mrs Allen was an unfit mother because she had an old conviction
for embezzlement.”


Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: FA – Babies
 
(...) But how did the mother know it was a "better family"? (...) Time will tell if everyone is a "winner". Even if they are - who is to say that the babies could not have gotten a better familiy if the system was better regulated? (...) Yes. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  FA – Babies
 
FA – Babies(?) I caught a 20 minute news item last night concerning a UK couple how have adopted twins from the US. They did this as: 1) There is over demand for babies in the UK – this means that prospective adoptive parents find it hard to get (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

5 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR