Subject:
|
Re: Change? Somewhat verbose...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 22:45:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
124 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> I haven't looked into the posting stats, but does .debate really command a
> high proportion of overall posts? In any case, .debate consists of a small
> number of "usual suspects" who chime in on every debate, plus a few sideline
> observers. Can it be that the posting of a dozen or so individuals
> unbalances the stats of all of LUGNET? If so, is there a way to keep it
> from registering in the stats so that a tainted posting summary isn't
generated?
(Observer here)
I'm not sure stats matter, why should they ?
I'd take it as a given that anyone who thinks LEGO-mindedly should also have a
sufficiently expansive intellect that debate would be an occasional part of
one's life - more or less.
So if debate's flourishing on LUGNET - fine.
If I note that debate gets a lot of posts - ok - then we're acting in a
'normal' manner - I'd actually be more concerned if it was languishing.
-Jon
(Lincoln Lincoln)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Change? Somewhat verbose...
|
| There's been an informal moratorium on shouting the past couple of days during which we've examined the benefits and shortcomings of the .debate group. Generally, it seems, we're agreed that .debate should continue to exist, but we're unsure of the (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
