To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 7788
7787  |  7789
Subject: 
Re: Critical Thinking
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 2 Dec 2000 15:26:16 GMT
Viewed: 
653 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:

Hey Dave!-- I just thought of a question to which I would like to hear your
response: What do you think about scientists who believe in God?  Does
believing in something unprovable put into question their worthiness as
scientists? Or is there some sort of "out"  from adherence to the scientific
method with respect to religion?

  Lar was already kind enough to answer before I had a chance to respond,
and he summed it up pretty nicely for me (thanks, Lar!)  I'll elaborate just
so I'm not guilty of a "me too" post.
  Many scientists certainly do believe in a god or ultimate something-
or-other, even if it doesn't adhere strictly to Christian, Hindu, or Animist
principles.  Two of the most famous quotes by Einstein himself are, to
paraphrase (at the risk of slightly misquoting):

  "I want to know God's thoughts--the rest are details."
  "I refuse to believe that God plays dice with the Universe."

Interestingly, Hawking has countered this latter quote (which was an
expression of distaste for uncertainty) by stating that God not only *does*
play dice with the Universe; he plays them at every moment for every event.
In addition, Hawking has declared outright that his work is not intended to
disprove God's existence, and in fact he alludes to "God" being revealed
through the equations of physics.
  I would say, therefore, that science and religion are not mutually
exclusive, in that one can pursue actual science with vigor while
maintaining devout Faith in God.  I would further qualify that statement by
saying that science and religion do not fit in one another's realm; the way
science seeks to explain things is not the way religion does, and vice versa.

     Dave!



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Critical Thinking
 
(...) Then WHY do atheists and agnostics try and hold religion up to the scientific method? Seems to me you can't have your cosmic cake and eat it too. Anyone stating that they need some sort of proof or evidence that God exists is inconsistent, (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Critical Thinking
 
(...) They most certainly do, although it's nice to see that you're answering your own questions... I sense that you are edging closer to God. -Jon (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Critical Thinking
 
(...) Hey Dave!-- I just thought of a question to which I would like to hear your response: What do you think about scientists who believe in God? Does believing in something unprovable put into question their worthiness as scientists? Or is there (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR