To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 7787
7786  |  7788
Subject: 
Re: Critical Thinking
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 2 Dec 2000 15:10:35 GMT
Viewed: 
511 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jon Kozan writes:

If you consider that creationsim has been around since Moses penned the book
of Genesis - and even before that though it wasn't written down, I guess you
can call creationism "current".
By your standard, then, most every theory known to man is "current".

  Not true!  The Geocentric earth theory is certainly not current to any
rational way of thinking, nor is the reproduction-by-stork theory.  I label
creationism a current theory because certain camps are actively promoting
its inclusion in public school curricula, whereas few scholars today assert
that equal time should be devoted to phrenology.

Also, "scientific", which you refer to, is a funny thing - it gets redefined
every time someone has evidence that doesn't fit the accepted framework. (I'll
not get into that).

  But I'll be happy to!  "Scientific" doesn't change; what you're getting at
is that science's understanding of the universe changes, and that's as it
should be.  I discuss this elsewhere in the thread.

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Critical Thinking
 
(...) Ah - "current" to you means currently in vogue, whereas to me it meant recent. Ok. (...) Sorry, science does change - at least the way we understand it. (Science is not how we understand things. Science is the framework we use to understand (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Critical Thinking
 
(...) If you consider that creationsim has been around since Moses penned the book of Genesis - and even before that though it wasn't written down, I guess you can call creationism "current". By your standard, then, most every theory known to man is (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

198 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR