To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 7608
7607  |  7609
Subject: 
Re: The god debate again... sigh (Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 30 Nov 2000 03:23:09 GMT
Viewed: 
955 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bill Farkas writes:

Actually this current discussion was started by Frank dealing with motives
for benevolence - which is where I believe the Christian ethic is pertinent.

That's an interesting point, and quite similar to the "is libertarianism
on the rise?" discussion.  If someone adheres to good ideals which are in
step with Christianity, but that person doesn't believe in God, are his
ideals still good?  I think Plato took a stab at this a few years ago (in
the Euthyphro?).
The Christian ethic, disregarding for a moment the actual presence or
absence of God, is simply a good way (disregarding also the atrocities
commited by those purporting to act "in the name of God") to get along with
people, if one holds basic ideals of human interaction.  If one accepts
those ideals to be logical and self-evident, there is no need to insert a
further divine validation for those ideals.
Obviously this isn't a refutation of the existence of God, nor is it
intended to be.

    Dave!


Again, great points. Romans chapter 2 deals with this in depth, for anyone
who cares to look it up.

For the record, as to atrocities, it is my opinion that any action which is
diametrically opposed to the stated principles of a system cannot be then
said to be "in the name of" said system. The Bible clearly states that our
actions betray our actual beliefs, thus nullifying any apparent claim to the
contrary.


Bill



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The god debate again... sigh (Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
 
(...) For the record, the point was any religion can provide "high moral grounds" for the people or not. You said several times without religion, we could not have a social life, since there would be no ethics, since there wouldn't be a supreme (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The god debate again... sigh (Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
 
(...) That's an interesting point, and quite similar to the "is libertarianism on the rise?" discussion. If someone adheres to good ideals which are in step with Christianity, but that person doesn't believe in God, are his ideals still good? I (...) (24 years ago, 29-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

231 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR