Subject:
|
Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 May 1999 19:58:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
952 times
|
| |
|
|
Christopher L. Weeks <c576653@cclabs.missouri.edu> wrote in message
news:3737225B.8E1F1DD3@cclabs.missouri.edu...
>
> I disagree. Complex animals (people included) use sex for feeling • good.
> I would say that people may be the only animal to actually use sex • for
> procreation. I really don't know what animals engage in homosexual
> behavior, aside from humans of course, but I assume that any animal
> (let's stick to mamals for more certainty) would do so if it gave • them
> the 'right' kind of pleasure. You seem to asert that sex for
> procreation is the result of lower-order thinking and that sex for
> pleasure is a result of higher-order thinking. That's backwards.
It's not backwards, it's instinct. If there is any pleasure, it's an
evolutionary motivator to encourage reproduction.
Jesse
--
__________________________________________________________________
Jesse The Jolly Jingoist
Looking for answers?
Read the rec.toys.lego FAQ! http://www.multicon.de/fun/legofaq.html
Power-search in Deja News! http://www.dejanews.com/home_ps.shtml
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
| (...) I disagree. Complex animals (people included) use sex for feeling good. I would say that people may be the only animal to actually use sex for procreation. I really don't know what animals engage in homosexual behavior, aside from humans of (...) (26 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
150 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
