Subject:
|
Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 May 1999 15:23:13 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
c576653@cclabs.missouri.edu&AvoidSpam&
|
Viewed:
|
2351 times
|
| |
|
|
"Jesse R. Long" wrote:
>
> > the 'right' kind of pleasure. You seem to asert that sex for
> > procreation is the result of lower-order thinking and that sex for
> > pleasure is a result of higher-order thinking. That's backwards.
>
> It's not backwards, it's instinct. If there is any pleasure, it's an
> evolutionary motivator to encourage reproduction.
Of course, but it's also all the animal is concerned with.
--
Sincerely,
Christopher L. Weeks
central Missouri, USA
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
| Christopher L. Weeks <c576653@cclabs.missouri.edu> wrote in message news:3737225B.8E1F1D...uri.edu... (...) good. (...) for (...) them (...) It's not backwards, it's instinct. If there is any pleasure, it's an evolutionary motivator to encourage (...) (28 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
150 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
