Subject:
|
Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 Nov 2000 08:33:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1277 times
|
| |
| |
"John Neal" wrote in message
> > > It is not the function of prison to rehabilitate; but to incarcerate.
> Christopher Weeks wrote:
> > Therein lies the paradigmatic flaw in our CJ system. And you (and most people)
> > buy into this line, which is the cause of the problem. It's a shame.
>
> No no no no no. The cause of the problem is that too many bleeding heart liberals
> think they can "rehabilitate" hardened criminals, and end up sending sociopaths
> back into society where they strike again and again until (that is, if ever)
> caught.
>
> If we eliminated drug user laws (except those which pertained to driving under the
> influence) and kept hardened criminals locked up, then we would have a huge
> reduction in crime in this country.
Would the Libertarians call this wussy flash? Why would you want to keep
the most abused of all drug laws on the books, Mr. Neal?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
279 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|