Subject:
|
Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 Nov 2000 16:32:45 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
johnneal@uswest.{stopspam}net
|
Viewed:
|
1174 times
|
| |
|
|
John DiRienzo wrote:
> "John Neal" wrote in message
>
> > > > It is not the function of prison to rehabilitate; but to incarcerate.
>
> > Christopher Weeks wrote:
>
> > > Therein lies the paradigmatic flaw in our CJ system. And you (and most • people)
> > > buy into this line, which is the cause of the problem. It's a shame.
> >
> > No no no no no. The cause of the problem is that too many bleeding heart • liberals
> > think they can "rehabilitate" hardened criminals, and end up sending • sociopaths
> > back into society where they strike again and again until (that is, if • ever)
> > caught.
> >
> > If we eliminated drug user laws (except those which pertained to driving • under the
> > influence) and kept hardened criminals locked up, then we would have a • huge
> > reduction in crime in this country.
>
> Would the Libertarians call this wussy flash? Why would you want to keep
> the most abused of all drug laws on the books, Mr. Neal?
Not sure I understand the question-- are you asking me why I would still make
it a crime to drive a vehicle under the influence of drugs? Because if you
are, then you are more obtuse than I thought.
-John
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
