 | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) There's a difference? :-) Wait, what did Rhode Island do? Note that France seems to be rather disliked by a lot of countries, note the admonition in that UK Revokation that we were to nuke France at the slightest provocation... Why is that? (...) (24 years ago, 17-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego —James Simpson
|
| | | | | (...) We would never resort to nuclear weapons - The Republic of Texas is gonna give 'em a good ol' fashioned butt-whipping. Which reminds me of a funny Letterman Top-10 List that I recall from many years ago: The Number One Reason Why Las Vegas is (...) (24 years ago, 17-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Just because that dirge was written in the UK, it does not follow that it is the UK view... and I assume you are not shallow enough to think otherwise. There is a recent history of England and France exhibiting a little friendly animosity. (...) (24 years ago, 19-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Agreed. There is no "monolithic" UK view, (just as there is no "US" view either). However there certainly is a bit of a running gag among many people I talked with about disliking the French and french ways. The UK and France are close allies (...) (24 years ago, 19-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) It is an English thing - not UK. You'll also find that a good deal of England still harks back to WW2, and loves reminding the Germans about who one. The feeling in Scotland is a little more mature. I'll quote one of you countrymen to sum up (...) (24 years ago, 19-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | (...) Sorry Scott but even I started to be interested in..:-) Really, what is your area of PhD?..:-) Selçuk (24 years ago, 20-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, I just ran a scan on all of Lugnet, using PhD as the search term, and there's no post from Scott saying what his doctorate is in. I also tried just searching debate and using Doctor, again, nothing relevant, then I tried Doctor and (...) (24 years ago, 20-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) OK Larry, I shall give you a silver star for trying. The key word to search for, I suppose, is "doctorate". It would have revealed: (BTW - EPSRC funded my doctorate at a cost of, in today’s $, $200,000 over 3 years. This focused on defining (...) (24 years ago, 20-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego —Sheree Rosenkrantz
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Thanks for satisfying my curiosity too. It is so much more pleasant here when the titans *play nice*. Gold stars for all! sheree (24 years ago, 20-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) So what, exactly then, is your doctorate in? Undifferentiated Civil Engineering, or some subspecialty? In the US there often (but not always) is differentiation within the degree. For instance my BS is in Computer Science with a minor in (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | (...) The way the UK system works means that a PhD means one researches a very narrow field - a doctorate in "Computer Science" just does not exist here. (...) The main difference between the UK and USA is that here we have no real taught component (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | | | (...) Started in chemical engineering, ended in computer Science? ..:-) Actually I always hated doing homeworks (and quizes, who cares a BA or AA where CB or BB, that you can get with only midterms and finals and projects, is more than enough..:-), (...) (24 years ago, 20-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) I forgot to reply to this bit. I assumed that, as you'd replied to the message I was referring to, you had read it. This seems like a fair assumption, but I'd be a liar if I said I'd never done the same. :) Scott A (24 years ago, 20-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Really? It's good of those Englishpeople to promote the US that way. Steve (24 years ago, 20-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) My school history teacher told me the allies "won" the war, these were made up of France, Great Britain, much of the now Commonwealth, the United States, the Soviet Union, and, to a lesser extent, China. Was he wrong? Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 21-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Lets keep politics out of Lego —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) The Empire of Nippon won the war. Isn't that obvious? (...) I guess that depends on the details. Did he indicate that "we" won the war only because the US fully engaged? Did he explain that we won in spite of Montgomery rather than because of (...) (24 years ago, 26-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
