Subject:
|
Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Nov 2000 23:02:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1024 times
|
| |
|
|
"James Simpson" <jsimpson@rice.edu> wrote in message
news:G3zJow.1ux@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
>
> > OTOH, how can one be morally opposed to anal sex? I mean your religion • might
> > dictate against homosexuality, and I don't buy that that's moral, but • instead
> > religious. But what about heterosexual anal sex? I mean between two
> > consenting adults. Is that immoral? What if the instrument of intrusion • is a
> > finger instead of a penis? Does the moral balance change?
> >
> > Chris (genuinely curious)
>
> IMO, an explicit discussion of sexual practices, be they hetero or • homosexual
> might not be in order, considering that Lugnet is a "family forum" and • kids
> might stumble in here. Granted, we might not want young minds to have to • tackle
> the abortion debate, but it does seem that a little bit of tact might be
> appropriate here. Why not take your questions off-line?
>
> james
Agreed. I don't particularly want to engage in that discussion, hence I
summarized my views in my previous post in a non-graphic manner.
While I think there is some more room for leeway in the debate group, it is
very possible for kids to stumble across this and it may not be appropriate
for LUGNET.
--
Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com
http://www.ldraw.org - Centralized LDraw Resources
http://www.zacktron.com - Zacktron Alliance
ICQ: 23951114 - AIM: TimCourtne
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
