Subject:
|
Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Nov 2000 22:55:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
995 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> OTOH, how can one be morally opposed to anal sex? I mean your religion might
> dictate against homosexuality, and I don't buy that that's moral, but instead
> religious. But what about heterosexual anal sex? I mean between two
> consenting adults. Is that immoral? What if the instrument of intrusion is a
> finger instead of a penis? Does the moral balance change?
>
> Chris (genuinely curious)
IMO, an explicit discussion of sexual practices, be they hetero or homosexual
might not be in order, considering that Lugnet is a "family forum" and kids
might stumble in here. Granted, we might not want young minds to have to tackle
the abortion debate, but it does seem that a little bit of tact might be
appropriate here. Why not take your questions off-line?
james
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
279 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|