 | | Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) Sounds selfish to me. I happy to live in a society where, no matter what my circumstances, I have the right to education, healthcare and housing. I also happy that the state meddles in my affairs and invades my privacy to make sure I am giving (...) (24 years ago, 11-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Wow. And this is probably where the discuss ends, because we in America value *FREEDOM* and *LIBERTY*. It is the basis for our existence, and why further debate is pointless. You welcome government telling you what you can and cannot do. We (...) (24 years ago, 12-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Scott, of course, snipped the subordinate clause I put on there, the clause showing a balance of rights so that all rights are respected. As is his wont. Snip away what might disagree with your point or show that the other side is reasonable. (...) (24 years ago, 12-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | (canceled) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) I was not trying to hide that Larry. And I did alert any readers to that fact - which is what you chose not to answer my questions. That aside, looking at the tone of some of the LP aims, I feel that they do not care too much for the rights of (...) (24 years ago, 12-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) From the definition of "critical" (1) (and I am surprised that I have to explain this to a Doctor, actually. What kind of doctor are you, again?) ... You are "critical" in the sense of 2 a : inclined to criticize severely and unfavorably (...) (24 years ago, 12-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) PhD ... (...) Yes you are correct. Even though I have a lot of respect for TL, I don't think he is correct all the time. No big deal really. If it were TL could change the T&C. (...) If you mean I don't agree with you, you are correct. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 12-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion... —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) Scott, think this through, and give an answer: what superior power of decision making does the government (which is a collection of people) have that any other collection of people could have? What makes the legislatures and other government (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) You or I can only hope to assist our kids in the education path which they choose. They can only make a choice from what is available. Educational planners are there to predict the needs of your country. At a low level, below are the aims of (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) You're a scholar (who won't say what his PhD is in, which is what I was asking) or so you claim... read some Hayek. (URL) demonstrates to my satisfaction, that no planning board can outplan the market. No planning board can predict needs, (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | So you accept all the other points I rasied then? And what about all those you snipped in you last reply to me? You are squirming Larry. Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Ah. A libertarian economist. Just what is your level of "satisfaction"? (...) If this is so, how can a collective of parents do any better? (...) Hardly objective Larry, you can do better than this. Answer all my points. Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) ROFL. This guy came runner-up in the LP man of the century! You using him for justification, is like Lenin using Marx (Not Groucho) to justify communism. You really are a critical thinker Larry, I am in awe. Argue your point with me Larry, be (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) So, exactly how little do you wish to have the right to do as you please? Would you be OK with it if your government decided that sales via online auction houses were illegal because they were funnelling money out of the UK and into the US, (...) (24 years ago, 12-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
