To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 7146
7145  |  7147
Subject: 
Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 10 Nov 2000 20:17:29 GMT
Reply-To: 
johnneal@uswest^NoSpam^.net
Viewed: 
734 times
  
Dave Schuler wrote:

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Courtney writes:

I believe abortion is murder, and should be charged as such in the criminal
court system.

  The removal of a non-sentient tissue structure from the body of a woman
who doesn't want it inside her is not murder.

Nice term "non-sentient tissue structure".  Merely because the fetus has yet to
develop sentiency doesn't mean that it won't-- aborting it robs it of its right
to do so.  I think timing is irrelevant.

I think that's why IUDs were such a bad idea-- birth control needs to prevent
conception from occurring, not dealing with it after the fact.  Once an egg has
been fertilized, it is a genetically potential human being whose rights must be
protected under law by the State.

-John



     Dave!



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
 
(...) Not to mention accurate. (...) So non-sentient tissue has rights, too? Do these rights supercede the rights of the sentient mother? Why? On what grounds? (...) Timing is the essence of the matter. (...) Nonsense. You are stating outright that (...) (24 years ago, 10-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
 
(...) I know Larry has called for sitting out this one, but I've got an interesting comment here... One does have to be a bit carefull about protecting the "potential" of human life. I read a short story once which took this idea to an extreme. In (...) (24 years ago, 10-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
 
(...) With all due respect to Kyle, whose credentials on the subject of sex's "purpose" I have yet to read, this quote proposes a rather arbitrary view. Who is Kyle to say what "sex is supposed to result" in? Sex is supposed to result in sex, and (...) (24 years ago, 10-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR