 | | Re: Something not right about Captain Ahnee and the Dipwads?
|
|
(...) Yer a stick in the mud. (...) Yes, it's quite funny. Personally, I find it funny because it's a poke in the eye of the Lucasfilm marketing behemoth that spawned JarJar. I can't speak for Dan, but I put the JarJar violence into my story (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Thanks a lot Pieniazek! (was Re: Something not right...)
|
|
Now Dan Jassim has chosen to omit the scenes from a great piece of work because you and your cohorts found it offensive. Its great that conservatives like you can suck the fun out everything for us. Do me a favor and avoid www.3-stooges.com lest you (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks a lot Pieniazek! (was Re: Something not right...)
|
|
(...) The Sistine Chapel is a great piece of work. Dan's comic was a cute piece of work. (...) Are you disputing that Dan should have the right to alter his work? Or are you disputing that Larry should have the right to his opinion? (...) Us who? In (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks a lot Pieniazek! (was Re: Something not right...)
|
|
I'm sounding off my opinion just as Larry has the right to do. Your point by point critisism is as bad as everything you're accusing me of. (...) There's nothing about censorship in my response. When Larry put his message up I passed it off as an (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | to all those upset about the Jar-Jar beating vanishing (was Re: Thanks a lot Pieniazek!)
|
|
(...) Don't be an idiot. Larry's (and everyone else's) opinions on the piece were just that- opinions. The author of the piece was under no pressure to change it OTHER than the opinions of people who viewed it. If he really felt that the piece was (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks a lot Pieniazek! (was Re: Something not right...)
|
|
(...) I don't think so. I was trying to point out why you were wrong. You were flailing. The only part of my note that was excessive was the description of my repugnance for the Three Stooges. It served no good purpose. (...) By that, I take it to (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
