To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 5511
5510  |  5512
Subject: 
Re: Murderer Reno's real crime...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 5 May 2000 15:57:36 GMT
Viewed: 
170 times
  
Larry Pieniazek wrote:

<snip>

I'm not sure what's your point here?  Are you saying that the gov should have let
microsoft be, even though the court decided it was breaking the law, just because
a lot of people own it's stock?

A few other tidbits. If this was a good decision for competition, why did all
the competitors stocks go down, you'd think they would have soared! If this was
a good decision for Microsoft holders where's my 40 bucks a share in lost value
over the last few months supposed to be made up from? Breakup value of the two
companies JD is proposing is 20, and 25 a share. If this was a good decision
for consumers, why do 59% favor MS and only 29% favor a breakup?

Since when do we actually decide what's good an what's bad by the changes in the
stock market?  Yes, the tech market dropped, cause it's currently very reliant on
MS, but if that will change, I'm sure we'll see a lot of the competitors' stock
go up...  And the fact that consumers _always_ oppose change doesn't mean that change
isn't good, does it?

Just some thoughts,

Dan



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Murderer Reno's real crime...
 
(...) Apologies for repetition, here are my views: - There is no such thing as a natural monopoly. All true monopolies are a result of government interference that raise barriers to entry. Get rid of barriers to entry and you won't have monopolies. (...) (24 years ago, 6-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Murderer Reno's real crime...
 
may be killing the goose that laid the golden egg. "When bank robbers steal your money, at least they have the honesty to admit they're just thieves," "When the Justice Department destroys $200 billion in wealth, it has the gall to claim that it is (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

13 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR