|
|
 | | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
| (...) Which bit? The liar bit, or the friend bit? You're coming along nicely, though. You'll be a fully-fledged CTOPper in no time. (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
| (...) It's just an expression, Al. (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
| (...) That's a bold assertion. Got any proof? (...) Is calling someone a liar, a troll and a jerk any way to treat a friend? (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
| (...) You, sir, are a liar. (...) If there is anyone on this board who would recognize mockery, my friend, it would be you. JOHN (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
| (...) It's just a turn of phrase, John. (...) Far be it from me to attempt to insult one as virtuous as yourself. (...) Are you mocking me? It certainly reads that way to me. (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
| (...) Experiencing temporal disturbances? I believe I asked you what you were talking about previous to that statement. You are obfuscating. Perhaps so much so that you've confused even yourself. (...) Ah, is that your expert opinion as one who (...) (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
| (...) Even if I thought I had anything to prove to you, John, I can't without knowing what 'it' is. Lies? Frivolity? The Holy Spirit? Either way, I took it as an inept attempt at insulting me, and therefore not to be taken seriously, but I could be (...) (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
| (...) I thought so. (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
| (...) Well, admitting your ignorance is the first step on the path to enlightenment, so well done, champ. (...) Full of what, exactly? (18 years ago, 11-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
| (...) Squirm. Actually, I don't know, which is not coincidentally why I asked in the first place. I'll let you in on a little secret, though. I suspect that you are, as usual, full of it. Prove me wrong. Bet you won't-- or can't. JOHN (18 years ago, 11-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
| (...) You, know - "things" (18 years ago, 11-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
| (...) Really. So what exactly are you "strongly" suggesting that I internalize? JOHN (18 years ago, 11-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The Brick Testament reActs
|
| Hi, Nathan. (...) So noted. :) Though I've moved this to ot.debate because it isn't really a discussion of the LEGO constructions themselves nor how I've chosen to illustrate Bible passages with LEGO. (...) Hmm. I actually thought it was one of the (...) (18 years ago, 11-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
| (...) Perfectly normal expression, at least here in Aus. It roughly translates as 'I strongly suggest you internalise things, and move on." (...) I'm not sure it meets his stringent criteria, but I appreciate the gesture, so I'll just say (...) (18 years ago, 10-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
| (...) "Pull your head in"? "hypocrit"? Austroll. Ha, think Richie will add that to his (URL)? (18 years ago, 10-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
| (...) Pull your head in, hypocrit. (18 years ago, 10-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
| (...) Very well said. I've always been of the opinion that the *individual* can make decisions for him or herself with regards to, well, almost anything. That said, corporations, institutions, and whathaveyou--stating these almost 'edicts'--"The (...) (18 years ago, 9-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
| (...) Very well said. I've always been of the opinion that the *individual* can make decisions for him or herself with regards to, well, almost anything. That said, corporations, institutions, and whathaveyou--stating these almost 'edicts'--"The (...) (18 years ago, 9-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
| (...) Hi, all-- This is yet another example of why one's faith should color one's decisions. I make a living working for a Bible School. I would be considered "Evangelical" and/or "Conservative" by a good many people. I attend church when I'm not on (...) (18 years ago, 9-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: I don't think the Southern Baptist *Anyone* can say *anything* about *anyone else*
|
| (...) Why don't they just call the position 'His Holiness The President' and be done with it? It seems to be what they (unreasonably) expect from him, and any candidates for the position, anyway (and 'they' are not just religious people either). (18 years ago, 7-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
