To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 27378
27377  |  27379
Subject: 
Woo-hoo! Dover gets it right!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:15:28 GMT
Viewed: 
1292 times
  
I’m pleased to see that some spark of hope persists in Pennsylvania.

Regardless of its apologists, Creationism is not science and must never be included in a science curriculum, except perhaps as an example of politically well-connected pseudoscience.

Creationism was debunked as an explanatory model of the universe centuries ago, and the god-of-the-gaps argument from which it sprang has been thoroughly refuted for centuries longer than that.

Mind you, this isn’t about “who caused the Big Bang” or “maybe evolution and religion are both correct.” This is about a far-right fringe religious sect attempting to force its dogma into public schools.

If Creationism is the valid science that they pretend it to be, then let them submit their studies for peer review.

Shame on Kansas, by the way.

Dave!



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Woo-hoo! Dover gets it right!
 
(...) I especially enjoyed the comment from Kansas BoE member John Bacon, about their new standard: "It gets rid of a lot of dogma that's being taught in the classroom today." (from AP story as posted on LiveScience at (URL)). <insert pithy comment, (...) (19 years ago, 10-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Woo-hoo! Dover gets it right!
 
It's the END of the WORLD! Ghod's Dee-VINE Re-tri-BUE-shun is coming, Sinners! Those that bee-LEAVE in E-vo-LU-shun will be SHUNNED! SCI-ence is a SIN! You WILLLLLL be PUNISHED if you can ADD too-plus-to! -Pat Robertson (Well, okay, there was some (...) (19 years ago, 11-Nov-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Activist Judges (was Re: Woo-hoo! Dover gets it right!)
 
(...) (URL) Here's> the latest. Just who appointed this shameless activist Judge John Jones (not to be confused with the Martian Manhunter) who sees fit to subvert the will of the people and to legislate from the bench? Why, none other than our (...) (19 years ago, 21-Dec-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

6 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR