Subject:
|
Re: How many of these have you seen used here?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 May 2005 21:22:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1146 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton wrote:
> Also, it's geared towards winning an observed debate rather than convincing
> someone they're wrong. Many of them are in fact *detrimental* towards convincing
> your opponant, but useful in convincing the *audience* to come to your side.
Exactly! Which is why I think many of them do get used here!
When I read this list I was reminded of your "debate card" of a few years back,
and I was doing a little scoring in my head as to who among the regulars here
used how many. (1)
1 - No prize for guessing who (in my own biased view) came out on "top".
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: How many of these have you seen used here?
|
| (...) To a certain extent, I think I've used: 1, 4, 9, 16, 20, 25, 32, 33 Of course, as regards #1, I'm usually an advocate of testing the extremes of any given theory. Hence, I'll typically show the extremes of my *own* propositions as well, to (...) (19 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
