Subject:
|
Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 21:15:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1482 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
Oh really, Mister Tolerant? So I suppose you have no problem with people
copulating in public, and in the view of your children.
|
I have NO problem with that. It should be the norm.
|
Clarity, Chris. That’s all I want. I think you will find that your views are
in the vast minority.
| |
| |
| |
I think to dislike that is to
admit that you’re repressed.
|
What is wrong with repressing private things? Why does EVERYTHING have to
be public?
|
Because to lock it in taboo damages people. I know you get off on people
being harmed in various ways, but most of us do not.
|
Excuse me??? What exactly do you mean by “get off”? Why don’t you just shut
your ignorant piehole, Chris. And who is this “most of us” you speak about? I
don’t know anyone who holds the inane ideas you do. You probably don’t think
that young children being exposed to explicit sexually images/behavior/language
is harmful. Clarity.
Really? What are the chances of a .het getting formed? None.
| |
Your rampant intolerance of people who are not. At least that’s what
triggers it for most people.
| |
Why? What is wrong with .people? The only reason why we have become
compartmentalized dorks in the first place is because the traffic volume
became too great. Is .people so busy that subgroups have become necessary?
|
Isn’t the fact that multiple people want this group good enough?
|
Frankly no. And the proof will be in the pudding when the NG goes largely
unused.
| |
| |
| |
| |
It
is too much of an afront to their sexuality. Wouldn’t the world be a
more tolerant place if we were all bisexual-- well it ain’t gonna happen.
|
Maybe, maybe not.
|
Again, more disingenuousness.
|
What??? He answered fairly.
|
So you actually believe that, one day, the entire world will be bisexual.
Cuckoo.
| |
I happen to think the world would be a better
place if we were all bi.
|
Clarity.
| |
But we might just select other things to be
intolerant of...so “maybe, maybe not” seems like a perfectly valid answer.
|
Whatever.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) Okay, so put your money where your mouth is and give the pudding a chance to prove itself. If it goes unused, you're right, and no harm done, except the loss of Todd's time in setting up the newsgroup. If it sees use, you're wrong, and there's (...) (20 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | human sexuality
|
| John, I know my views are in the minority. I'm not sure what made you think that I didn't know that. (How could I not?) That doesn't make them wrong. There have been a great many people through history who had unpopular ideas that are now widely (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) I have NO problem with that. It should be the norm. (...) Because to lock it in taboo damages people. I know you get off on people being harmed in various ways, but most of us do not. (...) ??? What a crock. (...) The historical body of (...) (20 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
