 | | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always. —John Neal
| | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote: (snip) (...) A "possibly incorrect aspect of a news story"? You missed your calling, Dave!-- you shoulda been a whirling physician:-) JOHN (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always. —Dave Schuler
| | | | | | (...) Well, I beg your pardon, but has the document been proven to be a forgery? And, if so, has CBS been shown to have had foreknowledge that it was forged? No? Then it's not at all inaccurate to refer to it as a "possibly incorrect aspect of a (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always. —John Neal
| | | | | | | (...) How can it? CBS refuses to release it for scrutiny! And besides, they only have photocopies... (...) Did they even check the veracity of the memos? Their supposed "expert" is even distancing himself from them! It's hack journalism at best. (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always. —Bruce Schlickbernd
| | | | | (...) You edited out everything but what was convenient to your attack and you think you won't be called on it? You missed your calling, John, you should be heading the election to re-elect Bush. :-) -->Bruce<-- (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always. —John Neal
| | | | | (...) Not so much an attack as a rib. Why defend a sinking, stinking, garbage barge? (...) I wish I were! It appears to be the easiest job around these days;-) JOHN (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always. —Bruce Schlickbernd
| | | | | (...) You defend Bush all the time, so evidentily you don't practice as you preach. :-). (...) Being a slacker and a professional prevaricator is your ambition in life? :-) -->Bruce<-- (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always. —John Neal
| | | | | (...) You weren't listening....I said sinking, stinking, garbage barge:-) You know, I have criticisms of Republicans, too, but you all have that angle covered, so my input is extreneous! (...) How much does it pay? :-) JOHN (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Fair and Balanced, as always. —Bruce Schlickbernd
| | | | | (...) Well, technically you are correct: I regard Bush as sunk, not sinking. Though I suppose you could be refering to the polls and not how history will judge him, which may lead to your confusion on that front. (...) Can't say how many, but (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | |
