 | | Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot? —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | (...) I should have read the paper this morning - the secretray thing was on the fold and I tossed the paper in the car without reading it. Interesting. She doesn't confirm the memos as real, but confirms Bush's commanding officer's opinions (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot? —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) In this case, repetition obviously doesn't teach the donkey-- Looking back at the companies that Dubya the Idiot was in charge of, looking at his record in the forces, and his personal life, a la cocaine and alcohol, and yet he still became (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot? —David Koudys
|
| | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote: <snip> (...) I know that sometimes my grammar is atrocious, but those paragraphs were just horrible! Eh, whatever... Dave K (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Jeez, you Canadians don't know anything. Americans like Bush because "he keeps us safe," "he's a likeable guy," and "he has strong morals and values." All right, the real reasons are these: he has terrified most Americans into believing that (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot? —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | (...) However, daily I read news items like -- (URL) mean, a person gets fired over a bumper sticker? I'm sure that if someone were to do some research, they'd find someone who may have been shown the door 'cause they had a 'Bush/Cheney' sticker on (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Microsoft and IBM in secret plot? —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) Ideaology. People don't want to believe that their candidate can do any wrong because the alternative is electing a guy that they disagree with. So, they stick their head in the sand, and pretend like these things aren't fundamental flaws that (...) (20 years ago, 16-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
