Subject:
|
Re: How about a glossary?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Aug 2004 03:33:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1483 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
Well John, that might even be slightly funny if it was all old news,
|
Well, that was the joke (hence the smiley).
|
Well, that was my point. Last I heard, adding a smiley doesn’t automatically
make a statement into a joke, it generally requires some humour to be
present.
|
No, only that it was intended to be taken in a humorous way.
| |
| |
Your post was about 4 minutes
after mine...
|
Really??????? No kidding????!!!!!????? Ha ha ha.
|
Okay. You got the “joke” but decided to deliberately respond with hostility
anyway. Fine. LUGNET just got a little less civil.
JOHN
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: How about a glossary?
|
| (...) Well, that was my point. Last I heard, adding a smiley doesn't automatically make a statement into a joke, it generally requires some humour to be present. (...) Really??????? No kidding????!!!!!????? Ha ha ha. ROSCO (20 years ago, 5-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
