Subject:
|
Re: How about a glossary?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Aug 2004 01:03:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1311 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
Well John, that might even be slightly funny if it was all old news,
|
Well, that was the joke (hence the smiley). Your post was about 4 minutes after
mine...
| |
but if
you read carefully, you’ll see I included more than your solitary useful link
and one totally meaningless one. So please try to keep the stupid **** in
.off-topic.debate in future.
|
Lighten up, Francis.
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: How about a glossary?
|
| (...) Well, that was my point. Last I heard, adding a smiley doesn't automatically make a statement into a joke, it generally requires some humour to be present. (...) Really??????? No kidding????!!!!!????? Ha ha ha. ROSCO (20 years ago, 5-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: How about a glossary?
|
| (...) Well John, that might even be slightly funny if it was all old news, but if you read carefully, you'll see I included more than your solitary useful link and one totally meaningless one. So please try to keep the stupid **** in (...) (20 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
