Debate : 25171


Off-Topic / Debate / 25171	25170 \| 25172

Subject:	Re: How about a glossary?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Wed, 4 Aug 2004 23:26:42 GMT
Viewed:	1336 times

In lugnet.admin.suggestions, John Neal wrote:

In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Ross Crawford wrote:

(snipped a bunch of old news)

You snooze, you lose:-D

Well John, that might even be slightly funny if it was all old news, but if you read carefully, you’ll see I included more than your solitary useful link and one totally meaningless one. So please try to keep the stupid **** in .off-topic.debate in future.

(Not even posted to suggestions as it’s already useless there)

ROSCO

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: How about a glossary?
(...) Well, that was the joke (hence the smiley). Your post was about 4 minutes after mine... (...) (URL) Lighten up, Francis.> JOHN (20 years ago, 5-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: How about a glossary?
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Ross Crawford wrote: (snipped a bunch of old news) You snooze, you (URL) lose>:-D JOHN (20 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)

13 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search