Subject:
|
Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Jul 2004 18:07:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1514 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton wrote:
| |
Why is *change* a bad thing in and of itself, rather than evaluated by
the *outcome* of the change?
|
Well, that is kind of the defining belief of “conservative,” right?
| |
Who cares what the Bible and the US government say about marriage-- shouldn’t
we figure out what’s *right*, and go with that?
|
But I think John believes that if the Bible says something, it is right.
That’s the measure of rightness. So he doesn’t need to look farther.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
| (...) Let's hope not :) If stated so, I have a hunch lots of people would start migrating over to the liberal side :) (...) Well, I doubt that's John's point since I don't think he's interested in making other laws to: - attend church on Sunday - (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
|
| (...) So your point is that the state has a vested interest in NOT recognizing marriages? Why? I thought your point (in a past debate) was that somehow gay marriage negatively affected the American family, which was the foundation of society (though (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
200 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
