 | | Re: 9/11 Panel: No Evidence Connecting Iraq to Al Qaeda
|
|
(...) Not surprisingly, Dubya is still (URL) clinging> to his "admit no error policy." Here are a few lies of omission worth noting: "This administration never said that the 9-11 attacks were orchestrated between Saddam and al-Qaida," he said. Even (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 9/11 Panel: No Evidence Connecting Iraq to Al Qaeda
|
|
(...) I think I know why. The stakes are so much higher now that it is too horrifying to accept. Most people I know, as far as I can figure, simply refuse to believe that President Bush was lying to us the whole time to gain approval to pursue his (...) (20 years ago, 17-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 9/11 Panel: No Evidence Connecting Iraq to Al Qaeda
|
|
(...) You might find this (URL) site> amusing, in its discussions of why and how US involvement in WWI, WWII and WWIII was orchestrated. I had a learned friend of mine ernestly suggesting that the US administration had had a plan to join in WWII (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 9/11 Panel: No Evidence Connecting Iraq to Al Qaeda
|
|
(...) Steve Bell gets it right again: (URL) (...) (URL) Blair on WMD>: "Saddam retained complete strategic intent to develop those weapons". Scott A (20 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 9/11 Panel: No Evidence Connecting Iraq to Al Qaeda
|
|
(...) I'm not "old enough", but it's my feeling that the Vitenam War was perpetuated by anti-communist hysteria and an unwillingness to concede defeat. Ordinary Americans thought they were doing the right thing, but when service men started refusing (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
