Debate : 24306


Off-Topic / Debate / 24306	24305 \| 24307

Subject:	Re: The Real Waste Re: More waste (was Re: More Orwell, for everyone!
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:31:20 GMT
Viewed:	2000 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote: > Why not base education on ability to learn {not} ability to pay? I don't know. I fear the room for draconian restrictions placed on "ability to learn" based on who gets to decide. Do you just mean it should be free to all period or that there should be entrance requirements and expulsion criteria? I'd hate for the government to decide who is suited to what kinds of education based on some testing (or worse) scheme. Chris

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: The Real Waste Re: More waste (was Re: More Orwell, for everyone!
(...) The latter. (...) Entry should be based on evidence of previous educational attainment (e.g. school results). Good school kids normally make good UG students. Basically, nobody who meets the entrance standards should be rejected because they (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		The Real Waste Re: More waste (was Re: More Orwell, for everyone!
(...) One has to (URL) the Balance Right>: today's Undergrad's are tomorrow's tax payers. The better the education they get today, the more they can earn (and contribute back) in the future. Why not base education on ability to learn not ability to (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

218 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search