To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 24311
24310  |  24312
Subject: 
Re: The Real Waste Re: More waste (was Re: More Orwell, for everyone!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:52:02 GMT
Viewed: 
2144 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
Why not base education on ability to learn {not} ability to pay?

I don't know.  I fear the room for draconian restrictions placed on "ability to
learn" based on who gets to decide.  Do you just mean it should be free to all
period or that there should be entrance requirements and expulsion criteria?

The latter.

I'd hate for the government to decide who is suited to what kinds of education
based on some testing (or worse) scheme.

Entry should be based on evidence of previous educational attainment (e.g.
school results). Good school kids normally make good UG students.

Basically, nobody who meets the entrance standards should be rejected because
they cannot pay for their education.

Students should not have to “flip-burgers” during term-time to pay for their
education.

Scott A


Chris



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The Real Waste Re: More waste (was Re: More Orwell, for everyone!
 
(...) I don't know. I fear the room for draconian restrictions placed on "ability to learn" based on who gets to decide. Do you just mean it should be free to all period or that there should be entrance requirements and expulsion criteria? I'd hate (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

218 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR