Subject:
|
The Real Waste Re: More waste (was Re: More Orwell, for everyone!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:39:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2135 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Parsons wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
|
| |
| |
There’s also the small issue that it costs a lot of money to do that. Who is
going to pay for it?
|
Oh I don’t know.
|
(snipped the rest away)
Precisely. I think you mean the taxpayer, in other words.
Bollocks.
If you found A$300M that’s not needed, how about this for an idea... give it
BACK to the taxpayers you taxed in the first place instead of spending it on
another boondoggle.
|
One has to
Get the Balance Right: today’s Undergrad’s are tomorrow’s tax payers. The
better the education they get today, the more they can earn (and contribute
back) in the future. Why not base education on ability to learn not ability to
pay?
Think about it. To do otherwise is a waste.
Scott A
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | More waste (was Re: More Orwell, for everyone!
|
| (...) (snipped the rest away) Precisely. I think you mean the taxpayer, in other words. Bollocks. If you found A$300M that's not needed, how about this for an idea... give it BACK to the taxpayers you taxed in the first place instead of spending it (...) (20 years ago, 11-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
218 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
