 | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Don Heyse
|
| | | (...) No, I really felt pretty bad about it when I posted. I shouldn't be in .debate because I don't know what I'm talking about. I have to figure out a way to get mozilla to drop the extra slash from my lugnet history entry: (URL) way the .debate (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Hah! If you want a good laugh, go back and find some of my early posts from 1999 and 2000--then you'll see someone who doesn't know what he's talking about. Heck, for that matter, some would likely argue that I still don't know what I'm (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) omgoodness--I'm sitting in some presentation or other that has nothign to do with IS, bored out of my tree, with my laptop running, and I read this. Almost cost me my job there Dave!! ;) (...) Dave K -show me a dangerous Canadian lunatic and (...) (21 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) There goes Canada again, blaming the US for its unemployment problems. You should have thought of that before you broke into Mike P's house. Dave! (21 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) Damm those lunatic Canadians!! btw, how did we get into such a state of affairs that the next election in Canada and the next election in the US of A are "the most important elections ever", as people are stating. Is this, what's the (...) (21 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) Does that include the "Pop Idol" finals? Scott A (21 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Terry Prosper
|
| | | | (...) Hehe David, I guess you're almost sorry not to have the Bloc Québécois to vote for now, don't you? Because what choice do Ontarians have? Paul MArtin the scumbag or Stephen Harper the right-wing extremist. Or you could waste your vote (or (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) Vote for a party whose platform is to break up Canada? Probably not Though, to be said, at least the Bloc stands for something, instead of this vague 'give us your money so we can waste it on stuff...' Beyond that, whereas I'd prefer a chance (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld —Terry Prosper
|
| | | | (...) I won't get into that debate again, but thank you for respecting my choice. I'm a separatist, as you canadian folks call us. I've never been canadian at heart. The point, however, is not to break Canada. It's to have our own Country. Québec. (...) (21 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
