 | | Re: Wining Hearts & Minds
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, it's far too easy to justify countless small atrocities by invoking The Big Picture. Here's the well-known and prevailing wisdom on the matter (quoted here, but famous in general): (URL) more and more ugly details keep surfacing (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wining Hearts & Minds
|
|
(...) here. People still swim in the ocean even though it's inhabited by sharks. However the media will always cover the shark bite stories because it's easy to sell pictures of shark bite violence. But they'll never tell you anything about the (...) (21 years ago, 4-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wining Hearts & Minds
|
|
(...) Yep, and I don't want foot soldiers to carry the can for (URL) institutional failures> either: In a letter home earlier this year, Staff Sergeant Chip Frederick, one of the soldiers charged, said he had questioned some of the things that he (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Wining Hearts & Minds
|
|
(...) This is offensive. I demand you either substantiate or retract that statement! I joined AI in 1987 and opposed SH when Washington/London still supported him. I opposed Apartheid when Washington/London supported it.I’ve even castigated (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wining Hearts & Minds
|
|
(...) I can't retract it. It's just a question and an opinion. I'm just saying you *seem* much more unhappy now than you used to be. Do a search on in .debate on Scott Arthur. Then click on "prefer older" and compare the results. It would seem to me (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wining Hearts & Minds
|
|
(...) Perhaps I'm unclear on your conception of The Big Picture. Here's mine, and I'd be interested to see how it fits alongside yours: The United States is widely perceived to be a hegemonic and militaristic juggernaut bent on securing its own (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wining Hearts & Minds
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Don Heyse wrote: <snip> (...) I don't know but the charm, for me, has faded in o-t.d. I get all excited about something and I banter with Bruce, or Dave! But it's more effort now than it was before. It's like I have to (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wining Hearts & Minds
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote: <snip> (...) I've been meaning to ask, is Richard's ban permanent? I don't have any clue... -Evil Wayne (21 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wining Hearts & Minds
|
|
(...) It is my opinion that Richard knows what he has to do to get the ban on posting access rescinded. It's my view he's chosen not to do those things. (21 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wining Hearts & Minds
|
|
(...) He has to say the "s" word if he wants to play here again. Other offenders do not have to(1); but he does due to the way his "outburst" was used as axe grinding material (IRC). I hope I'm not betraying a confidence when I say I know he lurks (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wining Hearts & Minds
|
|
(...) Mmmmm. I saw Geoffrey Robertson interviewed on (URL) Lateline> and while it wasn't the focus of the interview, he got to the nub of what concerns me about this. "...because what we're seeing here is not just the kind of abuse that happens in (...) (21 years ago, 11-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
