 | | Re: If you Yankees vote for this guy again...
|
|
(...) As an aside, I loved (URL) this quote> about your alleged president: For years it has been my belief that the ideal US president for Middle East peace would be one who had the ethics of a Carter, the popularity of a Reagan and the strategic (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: If you Yankees vote for this guy again...
|
|
(...) Ever done any reading on Carter's cronies? (...) Making light of a man battling Alzheimer's Disease? Too off-color for me. (...) (snip) (...) What the heck is "historic Palestine"? This leads me to think about some disturbing ideas I have (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | disturbing ideas
|
|
(...) St Ronnie was not the sharpest stick in the pile when elected! (...) Do you reject the Balfour declaration which sought the “establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people”? (...) I've heard disturbing ideas from both both (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: If you Yankees vote for this guy again...
|
|
(...) ROFLMAO :-) Truer words were never spoke! -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: disturbing ideas
|
|
(...) Funny, I was a Liberal during the Reagan years, and used to think the exact same thing. Now on the other side I see how that that characterization was Liberal spin, just as Liberals assertion of Bush being a "moron". It is partisan hacktalk. (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: disturbing ideas
|
|
(...) Actions speak louder than words: Bush is no intellectual. (...) OK. So Palestine did exist then? (...) Why should I? (...) Why? The status of Jerusalem under international law is clear. Scott A (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
