 | | Re: If you Yankees vote for this guy again... —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | Again? That would require that we voted for him the first time. -->bruce<-- (21 years ago, 19-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: If you Yankees vote for this guy again... —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) As an aside, I loved (URL) this quote> about your alleged president: For years it has been my belief that the ideal US president for Middle East peace would be one who had the ethics of a Carter, the popularity of a Reagan and the strategic (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: If you Yankees vote for this guy again... —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Ever done any reading on Carter's cronies? (...) Making light of a man battling Alzheimer's Disease? Too off-color for me. (...) (snip) (...) What the heck is "historic Palestine"? This leads me to think about some disturbing ideas I have (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | disturbing ideas —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) St Ronnie was not the sharpest stick in the pile when elected! (...) Do you reject the Balfour declaration which sought the “establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people”? (...) I've heard disturbing ideas from both both (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: disturbing ideas —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Funny, I was a Liberal during the Reagan years, and used to think the exact same thing. Now on the other side I see how that that characterization was Liberal spin, just as Liberals assertion of Bush being a "moron". It is partisan hacktalk. (...) (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: disturbing ideas —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Actions speak louder than words: Bush is no intellectual. (...) OK. So Palestine did exist then? (...) Why should I? (...) Why? The status of Jerusalem under international law is clear. Scott A (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: If you Yankees vote for this guy again... —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) ROFLMAO :-) Truer words were never spoke! -->Bruce<-- (21 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
