|
|
 | | Re: Justice for all.....
|
| (...) Scott never does that. :-) Neither do any of the rest of us here. ;-) (...) Rule #1 if you see a big nesting, deeper than 3 or 4, and it's you and Scott(1), and you're not getting anywhere with your point, give up. (...) International Criminal (...) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Justice for all.....
|
| (...) Since it's illegal to threaten the life of the president of the US, I shall not tell you how I interpreted that line... That said, I do not believe that Dubya did anything that would warrant such a measure. If he did what he did out of the (...) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Justice for all.....
|
| (...) Heh, beat you to it. (URL) Your point is facile. Even if nobody did condemn the way US troops were (...) I'm not sure I made a point, other than that google is not the best way to search for old news. I did find it before you did though, or (...) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Democracy.... Dubya Style
|
| (...) That's not what I said (or at least not what I thought I said). I thought I said he gives the appearance (to me) of someone who believes what he's doing is right. As for myself, I find the lucrative buddy contracts questionable, and I can't (...) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Justice for all.....
|
| (...) Some might suggest putting Dubya in front of something else... Dave! (22 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
|
