Subject:
|
Re: The partisian trap in California
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 5 Oct 2003 02:08:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
372 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
Though I do not condone the “groping” of women, I think his behavior in the
context of Hollyweird is probably par for the course. What is interesting
to me is that these women (some who remain to wish anonymous -- huh?) are
stepping up now just days before this election to reveal bad behavior
allegedly conducted almost 30 years ago! Puh-leeze.
|
Let’s for a moment assume these women are being 100% honest.
The difference between coming forward back then vs. now is maybe the
difference of having a bad momentary encounter vs. the bad guy becoming your
elected representative. Think about it as if you were the one who had been
accosted -- it’s a bad thing that happened and it left you with a bad
feeling, but up until now you could sort of move forward in your life just
ignoring that moment’s unpleasantness. Now the guy may be become your state
governor -- it rankles!
|
Sorry, I don’t buy it.
| |
| |
| |
But whatever, who can know the truth of these wild allegations one hears
about from time to time. It doesn’t much matter to me.
|
Agreed.
|
Your agreeing with that amazes me. Don’t you bring it up all the time? Don’t
you equate Shrub’s lying about Iraq as being more or less the same as
Clinton’s lying about Lewinsky?
|
Precisely point out Bush’s “lie” about Iraq. Be prepared to show that he
knowingly and deliberately, and also specifically (I want quotations)
misinformed.
| |
| |
LA Times = partisan platform for the Left (which is okay, actually, but what
I object to is the dishonesty of them claiming to be “objective”.
Disgusting and pathetic).
|
Hey, up here where I live -- nearish to Sacramento -- the TV media is
practically worshipful of Arnold. It is the print media that is at least
somewhat even-handed, sometimes even critical. But let’s not pretend that
those media are on equal footing -- everyone watches TV, nobody reads! It’s
not the same thing and it doesn’t create fair coverage.
|
I don’t know what to make of the media in California-- it is inexplicable.
| |
| |
Are you kidding me? He is a Republican nightmare! A fiscal conservative
but a social LIBERAL! Eek:-) In reality, the guy is probably the perfect
compromise between Repubicans and Democrats!
|
How do you know any of this?
|
Are you asking me how do I know any of his stances on issues? Read for yourself:
http://www.joinarnold.com/en/agenda/
| |
Seriously, you’re just guessing it is so. And
I’m sorry, but I don’t like the powers standing behind Arnold, that’s why he
is a puppet the same way Shrub is in D.C.
|
lol How do you know that!
| |
Calling out the right for wanting to legislate morality does not make me a
bigot. To the contrary, I merely oppose the control-freak nature of the
right.
I don’t dislike Xtians. I dislike their need to convert everyone to their
lifestyle. I just want to be left alone to make my own moral choices and I
am willing to respect everyone else’s right to the same freedom.
|
Really? And what about an American muslim who believes he is justified to stab
his own daughter on religious grounds?
| |
When the right, mostly because of a Xtian agenda, opposes gay marriage, they
are standing in the way of freedom and trying to legislate morality.
Recognizing that fact doesn’t make anyone a bigot.
|
Just curious. If you are in favor of marriages other than male-female
(remember, this could conceivably be a “gay” marriage), how do you justify
drawing the line at 2 person marriages? What about 3? Or 4? Or me and my pet
Eric the half-bee?
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: The partisian trap in California
|
| (...) Just because you ask this question repetitiously doesn't mean it hasn't been answered already, either directly or by a link to an article somewhere. I have answered this question multiple times in this forum before it was asked by you. And (...) (21 years ago, 5-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: The partisian trap in California
|
| (...) Let's for a moment assume these women are being 100% honest. The difference between coming forward back then vs. now is maybe the difference of having a bad momentary encounter vs. the bad guy becoming your elected representative. Think about (...) (21 years ago, 4-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
