 | | Re: It's All About Control (was: Re: Possession)
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote: <snip> (...) K, not the best example ever, but didn't the entertainment industry go on about 'v-chips' and warning labels on music? Of course they did it so that they wouldn't be 'regulated' into it by (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: It's All About Control (was: Re: Possession)
|
|
(...) Not by me... I think they are both good ideas. I just don't know if it or they will fly in the current environment with the BigCorps having their strangleholds on things. We need systemic change to restore the Free Market back to what it once (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
 | | And just to add fuel to the fire (and get roasted in the process....)
|
|
(URL) what's up with Canada? First it refuses to support the Bush Administration's little rape-and-pillage adventure in Iraq which is more than we can say for Democrats in Washington and now it has legalized civil unions among gays and lesbians. (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
 | | Re: It's All About Control (was: Re: Possession)
|
|
(...) Dude, that is 20/20 hindsight. What about paying Arnold 20 mil when the film grosses $200 mil? (...) Ahhh, at what point is that? Government intervention? Think it through. (...) I realize that, Dave, but how else can anything get (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: It's All About Control (was: Re: Possession)
|
|
(...) Well, it was just an idea along the lines of a 'universal library of stuff' that could be checked out that this thread was going on about. So the ideas about paying the recording artists directly from funds fm the checkouts from this library (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|