Subject:
|
Re: Revisionists...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:40:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
237 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Costello wrote:
| |
Look the situation is over so you can drop the DNC sound bytes. It should be
common knowledge that Clinton was persued and impeached for felonious
perjury, not his sexual indiscressions.
|
That whole line of questioning was really impermissable and would not have
happened at another time in history. You are talking about a man that lied about
having an affair. Why? Because supposedly you can’t be president if you inhale
or like oral. Hopefully, Shrub has broken the ban on former drug addicts. I’m
still hoping for a president that has done LSD or mushrooms and can actually see
beyond the length of his nose and his own greed. Drug use is no guarantee, but
it can’t have hurt.
Americans are obsessed about sex because they don’t get any. Don’t you know
that Provo Utah has the highest per capita porn consumption of the whole U.S.
Get laid. Take it easy. Follow the example of the our annoying ex-president,
please!
| |
Are you advocating that we should have just sat on our hands and waited
until we were in fact attacked?
|
An attack was in no way imminent, I think the facts already bear that out.
That’s why there is such a fuss about it internationally more generally and in
England very specifically. Heads will and should roll.
| |
I definately agree that the buck stops with Bush, and it should. However I
cannot see how his actions were a rush, the intelligence that Bush used has
been around for a while.
|
Dude, the Powell presentation before the U.N. was pure crappola.
Economic embargo could have continued to containt he problem ad infinitum as far
as I can see. Unless we find (read: plant) evidence of WMD, that’s all she
wrote.
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Revisionists...
|
| (...) When I talk about impeachment I talk about lying to a grand jury in front of a federal judge; I talk about if it should be alright for a sitting president to commit a felony and not be prosecuted; I talk about obvious obstruction of justice. (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Revisionists...
|
| (...) If you could take your confrontational partisan hat for just a second and re-read my last post you would see that I was actually criticising Republicans in congress who are currently playing politics as usual, by blocking attempts at an (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
