To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 21116
21115  |  21117
Subject: 
Re: Melting a planet's core
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 10 Jun 2003 17:49:02 GMT
Viewed: 
363 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Laswell wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Steven Lane wrote:
   I saw a program the other day which said that the planet Mars lost most of
   it’s atmosphere when it lost it’s magnetic field. It said that the field deflected harmful solar winds preventing them scouring away the atmosphere, but it lost it’s field when the planets core stopped rotating, this being the result of the core cooling down and solidifying.

Entering extrreme geek zone

OK let’s do the math

every thing is metric

radius of the earth = 6378137 meters

figure the “core” is 1/4 radius out 1594534.25

volume of core 4/3 * PI * R-cubed = 16982051976875485000 = 1.7e10^19 M^3

Ignoring pressure issues and assume core 100% iron

density of iron = 7874 kg/m^3 mass of core 1.7 10^19 * 7874 * 1000g/Kg = 1.3x10e26g

specific heat of iron 0.45j/g (pressure assumption effects this)

joules required to raise core 1 degree C = 1.3x10e26g * 0.45 = 6.0e10^24

joules in on gram of matter (assuming 100% conversion to energy)

E = MxC^2 = 1x3.0x10^9 = 9e10^10

amount of matter required to raise core 1 degree

1.3x10e26/9e10^18 = 1.4e7

Melting point of Iron = 1538 (again pressure issues)

to melt core starting at 0 C (aauming 100% heating efficieny)

1.4e7 * 1538 = 2.2e^10g or 2.2e^7 Kg or 2.2e^4 metric ton

So to melt the core you would have to convert 100% to energy and apply with 100% efficiency 22,000 metric tons of matter, that’s a lot of H-bombs

End extereme geek zone

Lester



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Melting a planet's core
 
GRIN.... (...) This is off topic for .debate... it belongs in .geek! C'mon guys! Now if you want to debate whether melting Mars is a good idea or not, that's different. :-) Personally I'm not sure it's a good idea, or necessary. There's plenty of (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Melting a planet's core
 
(...) That sounds a lot like the premise of the recent movie The Core, but I saw a geophysicist on TV talking about it, and how he liked the fact that recent movies have been inspiring kids to get into science, but he said that in this case he (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

10 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR