 | | Speaks for itself...
|
| The Truth Will Emerge..." (URL) (22 years ago, 23-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Speaks for itself...
|
| (...) I didn't see much wrong with a senator appropriating funds 'n stuff for his district--aren't senators suppose to do that? Especially this one, which seems not only good for his district, but good for America. I like Richard's link a little (...) (22 years ago, 23-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Speaks for itself...
|
| (...) Not exactly. That append got posted before it was finished, my bad. I'll FUT in a sec, including the rest of what I meant to say.... (22 years ago, 23-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Speaks for itself...
|
| Let's try this again. "The Truth Will Emerge..." (URL) truth will emerge"... more like "the PORK will emerge". Byrd may be right about Iraq, for the most part. Unnecessary war, and what appears to be a bungling of the aftermath in a much more (...) (22 years ago, 23-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Speaks for itself...
|
| I wasn't really holding the guy up for sainthood, mind you -- there not being too many politicians on the side of the angels. I agree with your assessment of politics as usual. If Byrd is making a bid for a soundbite, at least I am not disagreeing (...) (22 years ago, 23-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Speaks for itself...
|
| (...) Joining any party is a compromise. The party system has its good points, but most of the time I wish I were governed by individuals rather than parties stuffed full of "yes-men". (...) If the electorate paid more attention, it would not be (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
