 | | Re: Property Rights are the foundation of freedom
|
| (...) Excellent! (...) Yes and no. All debates revolve around appeals to ethos, logos, and pathos. In English these are ethical, logical, and emotional appeals; repectively. In mentioning Xtianity, I was remembering Costello's trust in a praying (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Property Rights are the foundation of freedom
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes: <snip> (...) completely (...) K, when I drop by to say Hi, I'm calling first, so you know it's me coming as a fellow AFOL and not a "Bible Thumper" where you'll have to "git yer gun at 'im!" (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Property Rights are the foundation of freedom
|
| Wow, I make a post, go to lunch, come back and the thread now is about me and my religion. (...) Although I do trust in the current president, and appreciate his commitment to religion, this in now way should be misinterpreted as a blind faith and (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Property Rights are the foundation of freedom
|
| (...) A firm belief in the win-win scenario. Despite my grousing, I am an optimist and an idealist. The optimal result is achieved when everybody wins. When I was in college and faced with the mind-numbing task of having to instantly recall (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Property Rights are the foundation of freedom
|
| (...) <snip> I remember those types of exams, and man did I hate them, I much prefered writing pages of compare and contrast etc. By you description of you study techniques you are obviously a hard worker, but you were motivated by a desire to (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
