Debate : 19727


Off-Topic / Debate / 19727	19726 \| 19728

Subject:	Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Mon, 24 Mar 2003 04:57:45 GMT
Viewed:	896 times

> So, let me get this straight-- you assert that the obliteration of Washington > D.C. with a nuclear bomb wouldn't end our society as we know it. Are you > daft??? No that would not end our society as we know it. It would go a long way toward restoring the government though. At the very least we should try to go back to the pre-FDR days. Ask your grandparents about how the elected representatives used to have real jobs and only went to D.C. when there was actually something to do. (As opposed to now where they inadvertently create most of the social problems they claim to be trying to fix.) See the funny thing about a Representative Republic is that we do not rely on our government (or at least we are not supposed to) it is there to serve the people. (not the other way around) -Mike Petrucelli

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) In the interest of furthering my understanding, are you talking about the same time period in which civil rights were non-existent, Presidents could serve an unlimited number of terms, the securities industry was wholly (and tragically) (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) As Rodney might say, "tough crowd"-- it's almost as if people think the idea isn't all half bad:-) (...) I see your point, but even if we were able to go back, it would certainly have a profound effect upon society as we know it. But how (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) Speaking of trolls... (...) Please cite for me examples in history where the taking out of a capital by a nuclear weapon has been manifestly unimportant in the grand scheme of things. (...) So, let me get this straight-- you assert that the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

164 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search