Subject:
|
shut up and take a seat
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 18:07:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
347 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> 2 - shut up and take a seat being in the form of "We don't like what you're
> saying solely because it goes against what we believe--Therefore you should
> stay quiet."
You mean like what Jacques Chirac told the new Europeans the other day?
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europe/02/18/sprj.irq.chirac/
"It is not well brought up behavior," Mr. Chirac said. "They missed a good
opportunity to keep quiet."
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: shut up and take a seat
|
| (...) Agreed! Chirac was out of line with that statement. I know a few Canadian political snafus in the recent months have also landed folks in hot water. We can't tell *anyone* that they don't have a voice. That's the thing about 'freedom of (...) (22 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
