| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Harvey Henkelman writes:
> > This should be interesting to watch...
> >
> > http://members.lugnet.com/polls/ballots/?n=121
> >
> > -Harvey
>
> I think I'm going to start a poll about whether member originated polls are
> a good idea or not, or maybe whether members who post seriously flawed polls
> ought to have their poll originating privileges revoked. Haven't decided but
> I'm tempted.
Just like I'm tempted to start a poll asking whether there should be a
disclaimer on all polls similar to slashdot:
* Don't complain about lack of options. You've got to pick a few when you do
multiple choice. Those are the breaks.
* This whole thing is wildly inaccurate. Rounding errors, ballot stuffers,
dynamic IPs, firewalls. If you're using these numbers to do anything
important, you're insane.
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New Poll
|
| (...) How about a poll like this: Are LUGNET polls generally flawed, scientifically unsound, more likely to annoy others than come up with serious answers, and usually have at least one obvious omission? [ ] No Cheers Richie (24 years ago, 12-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Poll
|
| (...) This poll is flawed: - doesn't include the universe of possible answers - doesn't even include a "none of the above" - displays the poll taker's bias in the way the answers are worded. So why would it be interesting to watch, exactly? Or put (...) (24 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
