 | | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression? —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | (...) Ceetain parties don't want it to end (e.g. said certain party answered his own message to get it back up at the top of the queu). Just ignore said person and there won't be a debate. -->Bruce<-- And for a demonstration of such, said certain (...) (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression? —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) I was hopefully going for a stop on the debate instead of a censure of the person. One *should* cause debates on other topics to continue unfettered, the other could be, imho, perceived as an attack on the person. Whereas I agree with the (...) (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression? —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes: <snip> (...) <snip> (...) Spectacular sentence construction there! That's what you get for writing half a sentence and then coming back to it a half hour later to 'wrap it up'. I think folks can read (...) (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) I agree with your disagreement. Ignoring certain individuals often achieves a great deal, and done properly, does not result in animosity from anyone else except the miscreant, who merely need reform (or go away). (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) No doubt you would propose yourself as a role model? Scott A (22 years ago, 12-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression? —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Okay, it now seems official, to me at least, that Bruce has now found himself a cool new sig. So, along with "Dave!" and "++Lar", we now have "-->Bruce<--". Well, *I* want in on the action! So from now on, I am promoting the last three letters (...) (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression? —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | (...) Oooh, now JOHN has one, too! Rats, all the good ones are taken! Here I am, still the same, Dave K. (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Help John find his mojo-logo —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | (...) I've used that on and off for some time now. I guess I've been more religious in using it of late. Actually, I'd like the Dave! better if it could be italicized - a Tolkienian word of power! Githoniel A Elbereth! JOHN. Hmmm (walking about it (...) (22 years ago, 12-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Help John find his mojo-logo —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Oh, I like that image! I see what you mean; looks like print from a Greek or Hebrew Bible. Perhaps I should add a "<><" after my name as well.... (...) "too" Apple? Can *anything* be "too Apple"? The world needs *more* Apple:-) (...) Well, I (...) (22 years ago, 12-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Aldous Huxley: "Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." I do not need people to reply to my posts to make a point. Rather than urging people to ignore me, perhaps it would be easier for you to counter my argument [as Larry (...) (22 years ago, 12-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
