 | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —David Eaton
|
| | | So, ok. I have absolutely no issues other than personal preference when it comes to the answers that Nathan's given-- They all make perfect sense. However, they ONLY make sense accepting what we (or at least I) would consider to be *IMPERFECTIONS* (...) (22 years ago, 5-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Nice can of worms. Actually, if you *really* want to get into it... God is omniscient (by definition). So God *knows* whether we will choose to acknowledge Him or not, and thus it is predetermined (Predestination). It seems to me to be of (...) (22 years ago, 5-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes: As for Todd's characterization of God; Sorry, I meant "Nathan":-/ -John (22 years ago, 5-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —Nathan Todd
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Thanks for the correction! I seem to have gotten 'todd' a lot of my life. Also thanks for your involvement in this thread. God Bless, (Before I cause a fight this is meant for JOHN) Nathan (22 years ago, 5-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Never trust a man with two first names, I always say. 8^) Dave! (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I thought the old axiom was 'always trust a Dave!' At least, IIRC Dave K (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) I thought the old axiom was "make sure you marry a man with two last names" (preferably old money names). :-) Maggie C. (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | (...) But if I did that, my wife would kill me. Dave! PS. By the way, I forgot "scolex" (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | (...) And Spandex, Dave! How could you forget Spandex!? Maggie (22 years ago, 15-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | (...) Aw, shucks--and I thought you'd overlooked my post. How, indeed, could I ever forget Spandex? Dave! (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | (...) That's okay, Dave! I didn't think of Spandex til the weekend myself! (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) I'm thinking YDNRC... (22 years ago, 7-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Well, I've never met a Dave I didn't like, so there's a personal axiom--I've never met a Dave I didn't like! No recollection needed. Though, thinking of it now, not too many Larry's I didn't like, either. But just those two... Dave K. (22 years ago, 7-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders! The most famous is never to get involved in a land war in Asia. And only slightly less well known is this: never go in against a double-named debater when truth is on the line! -John (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) Wait a minute--- John? Neal? I should have known! Dave! (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | (...) That's right! Have you ever heard of Plato? Aristotle? Socrates? Morons! -John (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Inconceivable!! (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Auch! :'( Any exceptions? Pedro (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —David Eaton
|
| | | | | | (...) The way I see it, there's two schools of thought on the subject. Either God KNOWS what's going to happen or he doesn't. If he DOES know, then it's not really "free will". And as such, God CREATED me such that I'll never accept him. Punishing (...) (22 years ago, 5-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —Nathan Todd
|
| | | | (...) Wow, wish I could end a debate on that note! (This is a joke, please do not take offensce). (...) I assume from this you do not believe in God (particularly the God of christians). Please do not take it amiss if I refer to his existence in the (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Nah, I won't take offense. I try not to let anything said in o-t-debate get to me-- it takes all the fun out of it :) (...) No, I don't believe in him, but for the sake of the argument at hand, I'm taking it as a given. Well, ok, that's not (...) (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea —Jeffrey M. Szklennik
|
| | | | (...) snip lots of stuff (...) big snip again (...) What if free choice is something like Quantum Physics (QP)? I've read somewhere that according to QP, ALL events happen, we just experience the ones we choose (the other events are potential (...) (22 years ago, 7-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
