To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18146
18145  |  18147
Subject: 
Re: Vote against/for...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:00:43 GMT
Viewed: 
682 times
  
dingus writes:
It's about getting things done.  The Republicans have some elbow room to start
getting some positive things accomplished.  I'm hoping for the ending of
federal income tax, or at least the death tax.  Let's roll.

Right.  I'd be happy to see some of those things too, dingus.

If you think the war will pay for itself, or be a short easy to pay for war;
then you need to reduce your lithium intake.

Bush will raise the national debt paying off his war-supplies buddies while
lining his own pockets with off-shore kickbacks.

The unreported enormity of the national debt is a hot potato that keeps
getting passed from one president to another, all of them hoping to not be
the one owning the debt when the thing goes off.

Boom!

-- Hop-Frog



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Vote against/for...
 
(...) I'm sorry for 'throwing it out there' to begin with... well, no, not actually. I actually liked this thread up until the word 'dingus' appeared (though to be said, the (sic) response was a jab as well--I think we all agreed to leave the (...) (22 years ago, 7-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Vote against/for...
 
(...) That's very nice. You should realize that such immature ad hominems only serve to reflect the complete lack of character of the user. (...) The estimated loss due to 9-11 was $95,000,000,000 USD. What do you suppose the cost (in terms of $$$, (...) (22 years ago, 7-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Vote against/for...
 
(...) That was my point. (...) *You* could be in the majority too if you'd pull your head out and join the Republican party to work for getting liberatarian agendas implemented, rather than support the go-nowhere, impotent Losertarian party. You are (...) (22 years ago, 7-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR